However, the result of simulation is unsatisfactory after comparison with the real testing result obtained (Figure 6): the pressure values on the upper torso were much smaller than the real one, especially for the side and back areas on bust level. ![]() Figure 5 displays the result of pressure simulation from Marvelous Designer 3D try-on system, which is obtained with the dress of fabric I and fourth posture (as mentioned in Section 2.6), and the avatar in standard female sizes. As mentioned before, the existing 3D try-on system had provided the pressure map with the avatar. ![]() In this way, the database of the inside pressure comfort was established. Simultaneous solution of Equations (3)–(6) and (9)–(10) provides the basis for a common mechanism, which helped in forecasting the dress volume shaping and the corresponding pressure exerted. Through the multivariate regression analysis, the equations for harmonization of objective and subjective comfort evaluations under textile materials properties were obtained as shown in Table 6 ( n = 27, p = 95%, F. Pij is the pressure (or subjective comfort score) in i anthropometrical point and j dynamic posture, Pa (score) CEV is the constructive ease volume (cm 3 ) limTM is the single or complex property indicators of the textile material that affect the CEV value.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |